Diretrizes da legislação estadual para a gestão escolar da Educação Profissional e Tecnológica nas Escolas Família Agrícola da Bahia.

Abstract

This Final Course Paper, presented in the form of a Training Report, analyzes the guidelines established by the legislation of the State of Bahia for school management of Professional and Technological Education (EPT) in Family Farm Schools (EFAs). The study considers that management in these institutions develops within the specific context of Rural Education and the Pedagogy of Alternation, which articulates school, family, community, work, and territory and requires pedagogical, administrative, institutional, and financial coordination. The research problem is to understand how state legislation establishes guidelines for school management of EPT in EFAs in Bahia, and its general objective is to analyze these guidelines. The documentary corpus consists of Law No. 11.352/2008, Law No. 13.907/2018, and Law No. 15.174/2026. The first and the last form the comparative core, while Law No. 13.907/2018 is used as a complementary reference. Bill No. 25.586/2024 is used exclusively to contextualize the legislative process that preceded the 2026 normative update and is not treated as legislation in force. The study adopts a qualitative approach, basic research, and documentary and bibliographic procedures, with an analytical-comparative examination of selected provisions. The results indicate continuities in the relationship between public authorities and maintaining entities, support mechanisms, oversight, registration, and institutional responsibilities, while the 2026 legislation updates the institutional denomination, the wording of the educational offer, and budgetary provisions. The analysis shows that these changes must be interpreted cautiously because normative provisions alone do not demonstrate changes in management practices or the effective execution of resources. It concludes that state legislation is a relevant reference for planning, organization, monitoring, and institutional dialogue between EFAs and public authorities, while maintaining the distinction between what the legal framework establishes and what practical implementation may demonstrate.